Just when you thought the arbitration committee didn’t have enough sex and drugs in it, the committee looks like it’s on the brink of accepting a case about American politician Donald Trump’s penis size.
You can’t make this stuff up.
The case stems from an April Fools Day post, “Trump/Wales 2016“, co-authored by
The Wikipediocracy idiots are of course shitting their pants. The two longest-running threads in their secret backroom forum are Gamergate and GOP, both topics now over 30 pages each. Their misogyny is legendary. They must relish the thought of trying to throw Gamaliel under the bus, and yet, it comes at the price of calling attention to a subject–The Donald’s endowments–that the Trump campaign would probably rather forget.
But don’t forget, this is really about protecting The Penis. If faked nudes of women politicians–and their daughters–are the norm, and the price that female politicians are expected to pay for daring to appear in public, then the other norm is that The Penis is untouchable, and must not be used against men as a political tool (no pun intended).
The Arbcom has finally got more than one woman on it, but this round has seen them all recuse, leaving only the enigmatically gendered Amanda, formerly DQ, as the only unknown quantity in this latest Wikipedia sausagefest.
So how will the press headline this case? “Trump’s wee wee-wee”? “Wikipedia pissing match over Trump’s pee-pee”? “Arbcom trumps freedom of the press”?