I am now a reliable source for Everipedia

Oh looky, I have been cited as a major source for the Everipedia biography “Tony Bannioni”.
But what is this “Gender Desk have also noted” and “Gender Desk also allege” stuff, as if I was plural?  Have they been talking to my Evil Twin?

I’m not sure of Everipedia’s copyright claims, so is it a copyvio if they rip my stuff and then I reprint it?


Tony Bannioni otherwise known by his Wikipedia​ username TonyBallioni is an administrator of English Wikipedia​.[1][3]


Bannioni has been accused by Gender Desk of leading a rogue group of Wikipedia administrators to implement a rule change whereby users who have been blocked and then caught using sockpuppets​ are banned indefintely [sic] from the community. Along with TonyBallioni, other admins who supported the implementation of this rule change were :

Jayron32, Ajraddatz, Dennis Brown, Amory (User:Amorymeltzer), Hut 8.5, GAB (User:GeneralizationsAreBad), ♠PMC♠ (User:Premeditated Chaos, currently an arbitrator), Kudpung กุดผึ้ง , Dennis Brown, Yamla, Dirk Beetstra, Malcolmxl5,  Mz7,  Nyttend,  Agathoclea,  Doc James , Thryduulf, NeilN, Bishonen, Ben MacDui & Nick-D[1] 

​Bannioni is also leader of the Wikipedia New Page Patrol. Gender Desk have also noted Bannioni supporting the introduction of a rule whereby only users with autoconfirmed status are allowed to make new pages and argued that the motivation behind this being to move work from the New Page Patrol to the Articles For Creation project. Gender Desk also allege that he has mocked new users and used threats.[2]

All information for Tony Bannioni’s wiki comes from the below links. Any source is valid, including Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn. Pictures, videos, biodata, and files relating to Tony Bannioni are also acceptable encyclopedic sources.

OMG, I almost feel sorry for the guy. Too bad he is so focused on ripping other people to shreds.

Oh and he has noticed it already.

9 thoughts on “I am now a reliable source for Everipedia

  1. An article written by someone banned from Wikipedia for filling it with nonsensical pseudo-archaeology, and who has now done the same to Everipedia, about an administrator on the project he was banned from. What could possibly go wrong?

  2. Nonsensical pseudo-archaeology? What did I miss?

    Article was written by Paul Bedson https://everipedia.org/wiki/paul-bedson/ Oh dear, looks like I touched a nerve: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Paul_Bedson/Archive Is he really that awful or does he just not understand wiki-speak?

    It’s oil money then? http://www.goldenageproject.org.uk/

    Let’s see, “In November 2009 Bedson conducted an amateur archaeological survey of the Aaiha plain​ in Southern Lebanon​ in coordinaton with Edmund Marriage​ of the Patrick Foundation​.” But “Bedson has since written several articles on the subject of Lebanese Neolithic​ Archaeology​ for the Association for the Protection of Lebanese Heritage​ magazine ‘Of Men And Ruins’.” No, I can’t go along with that.

  3. About using “Gender Desk” as a plural, I guess in theory there is no way to be certain that’s there’s not a group of people sharing the pseudonym behind the blog.

  4. In a way there probably is, a lot of this is stuff that is being discussed within the movement. I suppose that means I get to use the “royal we.”

    We are amused.

  5. I am glad I amused you genderdesk. I had visions that you were a war room of analysts with big screens, tracking Wikipedia, like battleships. I’ve fixed your plurality in the article so your evil twin can’t escape again. 🙂

    You want to see what you can do with Everipedia for archaeology and heritage protection. One of my articles on Mtein temple initiated a call from the Directorate General of Antiquities to the local authorities that got in a couple of Lebanese newspapers a few weeks ago and helped protect a Roman temple. 🙂

  6. I see the Everipedia article for Mtein temple comes up first in a google search, nicely done. And now I am seeing your cement mixer at Aaiha, IIRC that is close to where they grow all the hashish — Lebanese blonde, is it?

    Since this is a gender blog I will have to ask how is your Everipedia Gender Gap?.

    And what is this about Roman temples and pseudo archeology, also according to rumor you are more interested in Jehovah than Zeus. I can’t say I would mind being an amateur archeologist, though, whatever that is.

  7. Since the Everipedia model is even less suited to producing an encyclopaedia than the Wikipedia model, which never was capable of doing so, has not done so, and never will do so, and since the flaws in that model have been obvious and public for years, I conclude that Everipedia is not intended to produce an encyclopaedia. So what does it do that Wikipdia does not? It promotes a certain cryptocurrency and gives it some kind of circulation. In other words, it’s a scam.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s